Jane's Defence Weekly о расследовании JIT
Mar. 23rd, 2015 01:33 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Важное в статье:
Investigators from the Office of the National Prosecutor (OM) of the Netherlands have completed the first phase of their work in definitely determining the cause of the mid-aid explosion and crash of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 (MH17). Preliminary information leaked to the Dutch media has concluded that a Russian unit is responsible for the shootdown.
According to all of the evidence the JIT has reviewed, which has included more than one million documents, photos and videos, the conclusions to date are that the MH17 was downed by a Buk-M1-2 surface-to-air missile (SAM) launched from a Russian-owned battery that was most likely manned by a Russian crew.
The head of the prosecuting team then explained that central questions that the investigation is trying to answer are: first, who controlled the radar that provided the Buk battery with targeting information; second, who commanded the crew; and, lastly, who gave the order to fire?
Update: Статью удалили. но гугл помнит
Investigators from the Office of the National Prosecutor (OM) of the Netherlands have completed the first phase of their work in definitely determining the cause of the mid-aid explosion and crash of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 (MH17). Preliminary information leaked to the Dutch media has concluded that a Russian unit is responsible for the shootdown.
According to all of the evidence the JIT has reviewed, which has included more than one million documents, photos and videos, the conclusions to date are that the MH17 was downed by a Buk-M1-2 surface-to-air missile (SAM) launched from a Russian-owned battery that was most likely manned by a Russian crew.
The head of the prosecuting team then explained that central questions that the investigation is trying to answer are: first, who controlled the radar that provided the Buk battery with targeting information; second, who commanded the crew; and, lastly, who gave the order to fire?
Update: Статью удалили. но гугл помнит
no subject
Date: 2015-03-23 11:40 am (UTC)Fred Westerbeke объяснил центральные вопросы, на которые сейчас пытается ответить следствие: во-первых, кто командовал радаром, который навел Бук на цель; во-вторых, кто командовал экипажем; наконец, кто дал приказ стрелять? Служба безопасности Украины (СБУ) существенно помогает в этой работе.
Цель — подготовить документы для суда. Путин встанет перед выбором: либо защищать своих офицеров и взять вину на себя, приняв все последствия, либо выдать виновных (если они будут еще живы) трибуналу.
Откуда? Скорее всего по форме поражающих элементов и совокупности доказательств. Они уже знают какой именно Бук был. Из какой части и какой его номер (322). Теперь ищут исполнителей.
no subject
Date: 2015-03-23 12:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-23 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-23 03:03 pm (UTC)я просил ссылку на оригинал высказывания Фреда Вестербеке локальному оутлету, желательно с названием оутлета.
no subject
Date: 2015-03-23 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-23 01:56 pm (UTC)"At the scene of the reconstruction the Dutch public prosecutor was resolute: “The investigation is fully ongoing with more than a hundred internationals involved,” said chief prosecutor Fred Westerbeke. "
А эта статья тут (http://flight-mh17.livejournal.com/56923.html) была, у смолиарма.
no subject
Date: 2015-03-23 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-23 06:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-23 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-23 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-24 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-24 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-24 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-23 09:03 pm (UTC)мне интересно, действительно ли он произнес остальную шнягу, или это Рабинович напел, как в предыдущем случае.